I will keep this at the top for now

Great News!! I always wanted to view and own “Obsession the Movie” a very powerful movie about the threat that Islam poses to the freeworld. Problem was it was only viewable in the US. Now, at last it is available for regional viewing in Europe and the UK.

 Obsession is a must see documentary about Radical Islam’s war against the west. Using images from Arab TV, rarely seen in the West, Obsession reveals an ‘insider’s view’ of the hatred the Radicals are teaching, their incitement of global jihad, and their goal of world domination.  With the help of experts, including first-hand accounts from a former PLO terrorist, a Nazi youth commander, and the daughter of a martyred guerilla leader, the film shows, clearly, that the threat is real. A peaceful religion is being hijacked by a dangerous foe, who seeks to destroy the shared values we stand for.  The world should be very concerned.

 Buy this DVD and show to everyone you know, particularly those that haven’t become aware of the dangers of Islamification of the West.

Spread the word, click on the banner below or on the right and then buy another DVD, ”Islam - what the west needs to know”, another education on Islam.

 At last, some CommonSense for a change and kick up the backside for the dhimmified West Midlands Police. From the Daily Express:

The Crown Prosecution Service and West Midlands Police are to publicly apologise and pay a six-figure sum for accusing a Channel 4 documentary exposing extremism in Britain’s mosques of misleading editing, the broadcaster said.

The apology will be made at the High Court following the broadcaster’s decision to launch libel proceedings against police and the CPS.

A press release issued by police and the CPS last year claimed that the Dispatches programme misrepresented the views of Muslim preachers and clerics with misleading editing.

Police reported Channel 4 to TV watchdog Ofcom for “heavily editing” the words of Islamic imams to give them more sinister meaning in Dispatches: Undercover Mosque.

After investigating, Ofcom rejected the complaints in a decision published last year.

Police had suggested they had considered taking action against Channel 4 before being told the prospect of conviction was unlikely.

Police spent around £14,000 on the investigation, which was initially looking at whether three of the individuals shown in the programme could be prosecuted for inciting terrorism or racial hatred. But they then announced offences may have been committed by Channel 4, specifically in stirring up racial hatred.

Police also claimed the programme, broadcast in January last year, undermined “community cohesion” and “feelings of public reassurance”.

One speaker in the programme was shown glorying in the Taliban’s murder of a British Muslim soldier in Afghanistan, saying the real hero was “one who separated his head from his shoulders”.

Kevin Sutcliffe, deputy head of current affairs at Channel 4, said:”This is a total vindication of the programme team in exposing extreme views being preached in mainstream British mosques. The authorities should be doing all they can to encourage investigations like this, not attempting to publicly rubbish them for reasons they have never properly explained.”

Another atrocity from “The Religion of Peace” with over 80 people killed, far more than the 7/7 London bombings. You may have seen only passing references to this because it happened in India yesterday. I found it sidelined in the Telegraph and have only posted an extract. Please read it all from this link.

The reason I only posted an extract is that I want to devote this post more to the comment from Prudent Indian on my CommonSense website under This says it all. In case it is missed here it is in full:

Jaipur Serial Blasts: Indians, get angry NOW.

Another, City.

Another, series of Blasts.

Once more Hundreds of innocent men, women and children lost their lives.

Once more ‘mutilated’ bodies are strewn on roads, who were living human beings just couples of seconds before blasts. Some body’s Father/ Mother/Husband/Wife/Daughter/ Son. Once more these ‘bodies’ are now merely statistics.

Once more same ‘mundane’ routine.

Once more ‘Dirty Harry’ of Sonia brigade, MoS Home Affairs, In charge internal security, Sri Prakash Jaiswal, visiting victims in hospital.

Once again Prime Minion Man Mohan Singh mumbling same old shock and offering insincere sympathy to victims and their families.

Once again ‘Walking Zombie’ Home Minister caught UN aware.

Once again ‘BaliDaan Moorti’ Signora Sonia Maino Gandhi expressing her totally phony concern.

Once again MSM preaching us to stay calm and maintain communal harmony, as if Hindus start rioting every time their Mandirs are attacked. Umpteenth time now, Hindu Mandirs are attacked with impunity give me one instance when Hindus rioted? Just like the Religion of Peace’s followers did after attack on Mecca Masjid in Hyderabad.

Once again Secularists and Islam apologists are out of woods to tell us, how the religions of Peace’s followers are misguided youth! How they are alienated! How they must be brought in the main stream!

Once again more concession for them.

Once again Muslim Appeasement in full gear.

Once again More Bomb Blasts.

Once again another city.

Once again more Humans turned in mere ‘statistics’.

Once again the SAME AS ABOVE.

Once again the Prudent Indian writing the same above.

Once again, then again, then again ….

When will it stop?

Who will stop it?

How long we will be ‘mere spectators’?

How long before you or me or our near and dear ones will not be another victim of this unending spiral of terror?

How many more bomb blasts to take place, before we wake up?

How many more innocent lives to be lost, before we get angry?

Yes, get angry now before you too are ‘NOBODY’ but a mere figure in the ever increasing list of innocent victims. Refuse please, to be sacrificed at the altar of some ‘perverse’ and misplaced ’secularism’.

Very Angry,
Prudent Indian

From The Daily Telegraph today: 

The suspects were detained as police sifted through mutilated bodies and the remains of buildings following a series of bombs, which are thought to have been planted in rickshaws, bicycles and cars by Pakistani or Bangladeshi Islamist militants.

“We have picked them up for questioning in regards to the attacks last night, but we have not booked them on any charge,” a police spokesman said.

Authorities today announced a nationwide security alert and a day of mourning across the western desert state of Rajasthan as the full extent of the carnage emerged. Read More>>

What follows below is an extract from a long essay entitled ” The Jihad in Plain Sight” by Andrew C. McCarthy. It was commisioned by the Hudson Institute:

It is an unrelenting fact that Islamic doctrine is the catalyst for the cataracts of Islamic terror raining down on the globe. This does not mean all or most Muslims are or will become terrorists—though some percentage will, and a far larger number will sympathize with fundamentalist goals if not terrorist methods. Nor does it mean that Islamic doctrine is not rife with many virtuous, peaceable elements—though many of these, their resonance with Western intellectuals notwithstanding, trace to the initial, Meccan phase of the Mohammed’s ministry, borrowing heavily from other religious traditions as the prophet sought to entice conversion to the new creed; they were later superseded by the bellicose scriptures of the Medinan period, when the warrior prophet spread Islam by the sword.

What it does mean, though, is that the mortal threat we face is jihadism, which is caused by Islam—no less than obesity is caused by high calorie counts, lung cancer by smoking cigarettes, birth defects by imbibing alcohol during pregnancy, and countless lesser risks to our well-being by pathologies our benevolent bureaucrats compel us to confront remorselessly (unconcerned that they might be misconstrued as crusading to rid the world of food, tobacco, alcohol, etc.).

No less do we require accurate information about jihadism to arrive at sound public policy. Because discussions of this topic are so infected by timidity, passion and no small amount of demagoguery, it bears emphasis that there is no single Islam. In marked contrast to most Judeo- Christian traditions regnant in the West, Islam is bereft of a regimented clerical hierarchy, councils, or synods to provide standards of orthodoxy. Though the Sunni/Shiite divide draws most of our attention, there is in fact a wide variety of Islamic sects, to say nothing of the prevalent phenomenon—quite familiar to Westerners—of adherents who are at best culturally or nominally Muslim but care little about theology and its demands.

That said, however, it is whistling past the graveyard to ignore or minimize the virulent strain of fundamentalist Islam that galvanizes jihadism. And it is positively fatuous to suggest that it stems from what Americans say about it. Witness, to take just one recent example, the rioting jihadists in Indonesia who stoned and burned a . . . mosque—their anger provoked by another sect of Muslims, the Ahmadi, who are deemed heretics because they don’t accept Mohammed as the final prophet or jihad as a divine injunction.

It is simply not the case that a mere nineteen terrorists hijacked a peaceful religion, as President Bush hastened to assure Americans while smoke billowed from the Pentagon and lifeless bodies were pulled from the rubble of the Twin Towers. It is not the case, as the Clinton administration and its Justice Department were equally emphatic in mollifying the public when the World Trade Center was first bombed in 1993, that a rag-tag handful of miscreants had “perverted” the “true Islam.”

The species of Islam that has spurred these and other attacks has a long and distinguished pedigree. It is fourteen centuries old. It is rooted in the literal commands of the scriptures. It is a project that has engaged high intellects, and a belief system that continues to win the allegiance of the educated and the illiterate, rich and poor, young and old, princes and peons—cutting even across the Sunni/Shiite divide.

It is not the majority construction of the faith, but it is the creed of a sizable minority—and a dynamic one, underwritten by Saudi billions and catapulted by Khomeini’s revolution. Even if it were representative of only twenty percent of the Muslim world (an estimate which probably sells it short), that would translate into over a quarter-billion people.

For the past thirty years, Omar Abdel Rahman, the infamous “Blind Sheikh,” has been among the most consequential exponents of this doctrinal interpretation. It is he who spurred the murderers of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981, the WTC bombers in 1993, and, according to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, the 9/11 suicide hijackers. He is no perverter of scripture. To the contrary, he is better understood as a party-spoiling resister of modernization and anti-literalism. A doctor of Islamic jurisprudence graduated from al-Azhar University in Egypt, the seat of Sunni learning, his renown as a master of doctrine accounts for his influence.

Jihad, he instructed hordes of admirers, is “the peak of a full [embrace] of Islam…. There is no work that equals” it. He recounted that, for over a millennium, jihad had unambiguously and unapologetically called for the aggressive application of brute force against oppressors and infidels. It “means fighting the enemies.” Jihad was not about internal betterment, other efforts at peaceful achievement. It was not to be accomplished by such quotidian practices as prayer, mosque attendance, alms giving, or living a virtuous life. At such suggestions, he scoffed:

Jihad is jihad…. There is no such thing as commerce, industry and science in jihad. This is calling things . . . other than by [their] own name. If God . . . says, “Do jihad,” it means do jihad with the sword, with the cannon, with the grenades and with the missile. This is jihad. Jihad against God’s enemies for God’s cause and his word.

Echoing his most profound influences—fourteenth century scholar Ibn Taymiyyah, the Muslim Brotherhood’s intellectual engine Sayyid Qutb, and Ayatollah Khomeini (a Shiite whose triumph in Iran Abdel Rahman hoped to replicate in Egypt and beyond)—the Blind Sheikh exhorted followers that it was their duty to wage jihad against any regime that did not govern by Allah’s law, sharia. In the short term, this meant in Islamic countries; in the long term, because Islam aspires to global hegemony, it meant throughout the world.

The command is straight out of Qutb, who rejected as an absurdity that Islam’s core mission could ever be achieved by individual efforts at personal betterment or the religion’s intellectual force. Supplanting man’s dominion with God’s could never “be achieved only through preaching,” he warned, because incumbent regimes were plainly “not going to give up their power merely through preaching.” Expelling them was the mission of jihad, highlighting its centrality as a core Islamic obligation. The purpose of jihad is “to wipe out tyranny and to introduce freedom to mankind.”

Whenever Islam is obstructed by “the political system of the state, the socio-economic system based on races and classes, and behind all these, the military power of the government,” the religion, according to Qutb, “has no recourse but to remove them by force so that when [Islam] is addressed to peoples’ hearts and minds they are free to accept or reject it with an open mind.” All such impediments are deemed to be persecution, implicating the Qur’anic injunction (in Sura 2:190-91) to:

“Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you . . .and slay them whenever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter.”

Hat Tip: Up Pompeii

 There is no hope for Iraq as long as a father can be proud of killing his daughter. When the police released him with their words of congratulation for his foul, inhumane deed then that country and it’s insane religion might as well be nuked off the face of the earth.

An Iraqi father who murdered his 17-year-old daughter after she fell in love with a British soldier said death was “the least she deserved”.

Abdel-Qader Ali claimed the ‘honour killing’ was supported by local police, and said his only regret was that he had not killed his daughter at birth.

Rand Abdel-Qader, who was studying English at Basra University, was stamped on, suffocated and stabbed by her father, with help from her two older brothers.

It was deemed she had brought shame on her family by falling love with the soldier, known only as Paul, as she chatted to him a few times while working as a volunteer with refugees. She died on March 16, after her father discovered the pair had been seen talking in public.

Abdel-Qader, 46, a government employee, was released from police custody after just two hours, and claims officers congratulated him on what he had done. “They are men and know what honour is,” he said.

Speaking at his home in Basra’s Al-Fursi district, he told a Sunday newspaper: “Death was the least she deserved, I don’t regret it. I had the support of all my friends who are fathers, like me, and know what she did was unacceptable to any Muslim that honours his religion.”

Abdel-Qader, who remains a free man, threw Rand’s body into a makeshift grave as her uncles spat on it in disgust.

He went on: “I don’t have a daughter now, and I prefer to say that I never had one. That girl humiliated me in front of my family and friends. Speaking with a foreign soldier, she lost what is the most precious thing for any woman.

“People from western countries might be shocked, but our girls are not like their daughters that can sleep with any man they want and sometimes even get pregnant without marrying. Our girls should respect their religion, their family and their bodies.

“I have only two boys from now on. That girl was a mistake in my life. I know God is blessing me for what I did.”

Abdel-Qader, a Shia, said he was proud of the actions of his sons, Hassan, 23, and Haydar, 21, who joined in the attack after they were begged by their mother to help Rand.

He added: “My sons are by my side, and they were men enough to help me finish the life of someone who just brought shame to ours.”

Rand’s mother Leila divorced her husband after the killing and has been forced into hiding for fear of retribution from his family.

She said: “They cannot accept me leaving him. When I first left I went to a cousin’s home, but every day they were delivering notes to my door saying I was a prostitute and deserved the same death as Rand.

“She was killed by animals. Every night when go to bed I remember the face of Rand calling for help while her father and brothers ended her life.”

The 41-year-old, who nicknamed her daughter Rose because of her beauty as a baby, said she was trying to raise enough money to escape abroad. She added: “Now, my lovely Rose is in her grave. But, God will make her father pay, either in this world … or in the world after.”

I thought I would put the latest local election results in perspective, especially for any non UK readers. The elections to the local councils are a step below the US Senate. The equivalent of the US Senate I understand to be our County Councils. Counties are our equivalent of states.

So the only thing the local elections do is show a trend. The trend is a move away from a Labour Government and a swing to the Conservatives. Don’t hold your breath though, the Conservatives are only slightly to the right of Labour these days. On the plus side if they were to form the next government they could make a difference in various ways:

In opposition they have opposed or have said:

• They will opt out of the Brussels Human Rights Act
• Stiffer immigration controls
• They opposed the EU Lisbon constitution treaty
• They oppose the cult of multiculturalism

There will be more but that’s all that springs to mind. Those four above are important enough to make some difference if not only a small step. In addition, Conservatives tend to be patriotic and support their country and culture especially amongst the grass roots. Those dyed in the wool Conservatives will not let the leadership betray us.

As for the giant leap, well, getting rid of Red Ken Livingstone is wonderful news, even for us non Londoners. Boris Johnson won the vote on the basis of the ordinary English people on the outer ring of London. Livingston won the inner ring on the back of ethnic votes. The Muslims in particular were told to vote for him. Anything that is good for the Muslims is bad for the rest of us so ,yes, that is a victory.

In the inner ring the ethnic English turned to the BNP because Livingstone’s Labour Party was ignoring them, too busy trying to secure the Muslim vote. As a result the BNP now have a representative on the London Assembly, in the name of Richard Barnbrook.

It will be interesting to see if Boris Johnson supports the London Mega Mosque, the building of which is opposed by even moderate Muslims. The point is the tide has turned in London and may turn in the rest of the UK in a couple of years time when there is a general election.

My feeling is that Gordon Brown will not be able to recover from these defeats, because the electorate have a long list of issues that are pissing them off, issues that he is incapable of dealing with.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

My mind is boggled by this from the “Religion of Peace” I suppose a charge of murder is out of the question? It get’s crazier and nastier from the religion of the insane every day:

Pakistan’s Daily Times reports that the members of Lashkar-e-Islam (literally ‘Army of Islam’) shot dead a man, standing near a Mosque at the time of prayer, who refused to come inside for praying when ordered to do so by the mujahideen. The newspaper reports:

Activists of the Lashkar-e-Islam (LI) killed a man in Sarband Police Station jurisdiction on Saturday, police said. Sources within the police told Daily Times that Mukarram, son of Asadullah, was chastised by LI men for not offering Asr prayers and standing outside a mosque. When Mukarram told the men that it was his personal matter, the LI men shot him dead.

This may sound barbaric and cruel, but for a committed Jihadi, it is a matter of principle and pride, and following the commands of Islam. Using violence for enforcing prayers upon the faithful is a pious commandment from Islam, which was practised by the favorite and final prophet of Allah.

First, children are to be beaten if they refuse to pray after they reach the age of 10

I have said before that I would like to see the BNP gain elected members in the local elections that were held yesterday if only to act as a catalyst to sharpen up the main parties. it’s mid morning the day after and all we know from the MSM is that Labour has been trounced, and only from BNP sources, the BNP has a gain of eight with more to come.

The BBC briefly mentioned last night that the BNP had gained two. Nowhere else is there any mention that the BNP are actually doing quite well. It’s as if the “establishment” don’t want the public to know how successfull the BNP actually has been as if voting BNP is a contagious disease so like a hospital bug they keep it quiet.

Not only that but like Mugabe they are quite capable of interfering with the ballot papers as this report shows:

The newly elected British National Party councillor for Tilbury Riverside in Thurrock, Emma Colgate, reports in from the Alexandra Palace counting station:

“We have lodged an official complaint with the Returning Officer here over the large number of ballot boxes, stored overnight, which have had their seals broken and the contents obviously interfered with. The ballot boxes here are quite literally hanging open.

The Returning Officer says they have taken note, but that there is nothing we can do about it.”

Councillors Richard Barnbrook and Bob Bailey, leader and deputy leader of the BNP on Barking and Dagenham Council, and also the number one and two candidates on the GLA top-up list for the BNP, have, just a few minutes ago of writing, lodged a complaint with the election observers at ExCel in Central London.

More on this widespread fraud to follow shortly.

With Asians/Muslims manning many polling stations and Asians/Muslims fraudulently manipulating postal votes Robert Mugabe will be laughing his socks off at the copy cat antics of Little Britain.

Update: The BNP has gained at least 16 seats so far and in some areas took 30 - 40 percent of the vote. The London Mayoral Election seems likely to get rid of the despicable Ken Livingstone. Thank goodness, no more extremists Imams invited to the Capital.

 This post is off topic but I need to say this; capitalism generally speaking is the best system in place but as in all paradigms there are always extremes. In the UK today I believe we have an extreme version of capitalism whereby the rich are becoming obscenely rich and increasing in numbers and the poor are . . .  very poor and increasing in numbers.

That such an important economic resource as the Grangemouth Refinery should be owned by one man is ridiculous. Even more so when you consider that he is one of those “asset stripper” equity investors who only consider their own bank balance and don’t give a toss for their employees.

The fact is the North Sea oil fields are dependant on the Grangemouth Refinery for power and are now closed down. The cost to the country is huge. Jim Ratcliffe, the all powerful dictator owner of the refinery is trying to take away certain pension rights from his workers, hence the strike.

In a bid to swell his coffers even further he is costing the country millions of pounds per day in lost North Sea oil and gas production for which we will all have to pay in increased fuel and gas prices. I don’t blame the workers for trying to cling onto what they have got and I hope they bring Jim Ratcliffe to his knees. In fact, in a perfect world I would strip this asset stripper of this particulary important national asset. In the Daily Telegraph:

Jim Ratcliffe, the owner of the Ineos plant, is said to be worth £3.5 billion and is one of Britain’s richest men.

The 55-year-old lives in an £8 million house near the Hampshire village of Buckler’s Hard. He travels the world by private jet and lists collecting garden tractors among his hobbies.

After graduating in chemical engineering from Birmingham in 1974, he joined Esso.

He married Amanda Townson in 1985 and the couple have two sons, now aged 21 and 19. They later separated and she now runs a horse riding company near Salisbury, Wilts.

Mr Ratcliffe became a director of Advent International, the private equity group, in 1989 funding investments in the chemicals sector, and used his own money to buy a BP chemical unit for £40 million.

He created Ineos in 1998 and began buying unwanted subsidiaries from ICI and BP, before buying BP’s entire petrochemicals division, including Grangemouth, for £6 billion.

In the past 10 years it has become Britain’s biggest privately owned company, and Ratcliffe, who is said to keep workers waiting for breakfast meetings while he takes a morning jog, owns two thirds of the company’s shares.

There’s too many hyenas such as Ratcliffe stripping Britain of it’s assets and employment. If they are British then they are traitors and if they are foreigners then they are scavengers. There are so many cases that it would seem that soon we won’t be manufacturing very much in the UK. Anything for a fast buck and to hell with the consequences. Here is another case of a British engineering company closing with it’s jobs exported to eastern Europe:

Miba, a strategic partner of the international engine and automotive industry, opened its new production site for steel discs in the Slovakian town of Vráble on September 20. At the plant 230 employees will annually produce 13 million steel components for clutches and brakes to be used in commercial vehicles such as construction machinery, tractors and trucks. A total of 20 million euros has been invested in the plant.”

What the Press Release doesn’t say is this.  The opening of their new plant was only made possible because the company, ‘Milba AG’, had previously bought, and then asset stripped, the Sheffield manufacturing company, ‘Tyzak’.

Recently, we received a letter from a man who had been a long serving worker at Tyzak’s.  At the same time as giving a graphic insight into how events surrounding the closure of the ‘tooling’ company developed, the letter also  explains, all too well, just how such closures are all too often blamed on the lazyness of British workers.  What follows helps to blast that particular myth wide apart. Read it all >>

And here’s another one; Butler and Tanner, a long established colour printing firm closed suddenly, locking the workers out. Presumably their quality book printing business will be transferred to Italy. Their “asset stripping, equity investor owner hyenas” are having a laugh. The company occupies a large area of land which is surrounded by new housing developments. Presumably they will sell the site for millions. Read it here>>

It’s my view that as traitors the hyenas should be rounded up and shot.

Just another almost daily racist attack perpetrated on our indigenous population. I found this on an Asian website but I doubt if I would find it in the MSM. The fact that it is reported on that website almost certainly means the attackers were Muslims, although they are described as Asians in the usual way. You see the website is for Hindus and Sikhs and anyway they generally don’t do this sort of thing:

A mother has condemned young thugs who robbed and beat her teenage son and left him naked in a park.

David Procter, 16, was forced to strip and hand over jewellery and his mobile phone, before being viciously punched and kicked in the head and body.

His three attackers also set two dogs on him and he was bitten on the ear.

The youngster, who suffers from asthma, was left with serious facial injuries, including a broken nose, fractured cheekbone and broken teeth.

A passing motorist draped a blanket around him and took him to Bradford Royal Infirmary for treatment.

Detectives are investigating the “unusual” incident. Read it all>>

The fact is that the majority of racist attacks in the UK are on white people by Muslims with a considerable number of rapes and murders. The graph shows the situation as it is not as the government would show it and is based on official statistics. Thing is the statistics are 8 years old and we all know that such attacks have increased considerably since then. In fact, I believe that we would be shocked if we saw the up to date situation. I suspect they don’t produce race crime stats now.

I suggest that all those who are concerned by the Islamification of their country should read this very long essay from El Ingles, found on The Gates of Vienna . The extract below consists of the beginning and the end of this thought provoking essay. I suggest that it is worth reading it all:

A few months ago, I wrote “The Danish Civil War”, a fictional scenario which served to structure a consideration of various issues relating to the rise of Islam in Europe and the likely consequences thereof. The essay finished with the conclusion that Islam constituted an existential threat to the survival of European civilization, and that Islam’s influence on Europe therefore needed to be eliminated. It further concluded that, logically speaking, the various ways of achieving this goal could be broadly subdivided into three categories:

inducing Muslims to leave of their own free will

mass deportations, and

genocide

(Hereinafter referred to as options one, two and three, respectively)

This final conclusion was delivered as dispassionately as possible due to a desire to present the situation objectively, as if an alien super-intelligence were viewing the conflicts of various warring tribes of hairless apes. If I am correct in arguing that the number of Muslims in Europe must be reduced to no more than a fraction of its current value, then the three options I discussed are the only three options for achieving this goal. We may consider all three to be morally abhorrent and decide to submit to Islam rather than avail ourselves of any of them, but that does not alter the brute analysis of what could, in principle, be done in response to the Islamization of Europe . . . .

. . . . Given my obvious and adamant opposition to European countries allowing themselves to have their political, cultural, or legal destinies influenced by their rapidly-growing Islamic populations, and my belief that, in all likelihood, violence edging towards the genocidal would be an inevitable part of removing this threat, readers would be perfectly justified in wondering if I am advocating genocide. The answer is no. Let me make clear what I do in fact advocate in the context of my own country, that is to say, the policies I would immediately implement if I were the sole, unchallenged ruler of the UK. I will not concern myself with any legal issues that would be involved in actually implementing such policies; ignoring such technicalities is one of the great pleasures of being dictator-for-a-day.

As newly installed ruler, I would introduce an immediate ban on Muslim immigration. If I were in an exceptionally good mood, I would consider allowing up to 100 Muslims annually to gain temporary residency in the UK if, and only if, they were married to non-Muslim UK citizens. Other than this, no Muslim would be granted permission to live in the UK unless essential (diplomatic staff, etc.). Visas, whether for tourism, study, or business, would be exceptionally hard to come by for Muslims, especially for Saudis wishing to go shopping at Harrods. As a result of this policy, exogenous growth of the Muslim population of the UK would be reduced to zero. The question of determining who was a Muslim and who was not would not be difficult for a committed immigration service to answer, and in the case of any doubt, permission to enter the country would simply be denied.

It would be announced that immigrant Muslims, of whatever generation, (i.e. the overwhelming majority) would all be investigated to discover whether they had any record whatsoever of supporting the erosion of British freedoms to further the dictates of Islam, and could demonstrate proactive efforts to engage with British society on its terms. Anyone failing to satisfy any of these criteria would be deported immediately, without the possibility of appeal. Ideally, the announcement in advance would serve to inform many Muslims that their days in the country were numbered, and provide them with a period of time in which to put their affairs in order and hopefully make a dignified exit from the country of their own accord. Muslims claiming to have converted to another religion would have to provide evidence of attendance at a house of worship of said religion for at least the last year. Questionable cases would be deported. Anyone having been judged to be in accordance with these criteria would be informed that they could be deported at any time in the future if they were judged to have ceased to comply in any respect.

Having banned Muslim immigration and deported some hundreds of thousands of people, thereby addressing the most pressing demographic issues, attention would be turned to undermining Islam itself at the institutional level. Mosque construction would be banned, and locations serving as mosques without official permission would be closed down by the police. Attending an illegal mosque would be considered grounds for deportation. Advocating or defending the use of violence in support of any Muslim cause would be considered grounds for deportation. Advocating the adoption of any aspect of shari’a law would be considered grounds for deportation, especially if you happened to be the head of the Church of England. A thousand and one various other gradual restrictions could be conceived of to squeeze Muslims so hard that they concluded that there was simply no point in remaining in the UK at all, up to and including the classification of Islam itself as a pernicious political ideology, the practice of which would be considered grounds for deportation for immigrants or their children, imprisonment in the case of native Britons.

Read it all

Gordon Brown is pictured at yet another of the unending series of commemorations of the death of Stephen Lawrence. How about fellow Scot Kriss Donald? Would Gordon be seen at a memorial service for that young man? Well, assuming there were a memorial service, which is unlikely, Gordon would NOT be seen there because the victim who died a horrible death at the hands of Muslims was WHITE, but no, they say it wasn’t a racist crime. Meanwhile the Stephen Lawrence bandwaggon rolls on. This, from Sarah: Maid of Albion:

Will they never give it a rest? or will we get a 16th anniversary Commemoration of Stephen’s passing, then further commemorations each in perpetuity whilst more and more shrines are built in his memory each year until the whole of South East London is covered in painted glass?

Clearly no other murder victim. at least no white one, will ever be valued as highly by the media and establishment as Stephen Lawrence is. Be assured that if your child is white and he or she is the victim of racial violence, no matter how awful, no politician will ever attend memorial services in their memory, or make speeches about them. If your child is murdered by a person from an ethnic minority, the media and the establishment will immediately seek to bury their memory and deny their suffering, whilst they continue to worship at the shrine of the blessed Stephen. (who may, or may not have been the victim of racial violence)

Remember that in the eyes of the media and the Politicians from most of the main political parties, as a white person, you and your children of of little value in your own land.

 Well, blow me, we found a moderate Muslim in this posting - something I said was as rare as hens teeth. Now it seems that the Bristol, English convert, Andrew Ibrahim was shopped by moderate Muslims. Now that’s one small step for man but a giant leap for Muslims. If that were to be repeated throughout the country we might believe that the majority do not support the extremists. From The Sun:

MODERATE Muslims “shopped” terror suspect Andrew Ibrahim to cops after he began spouting “extremist language”, it was revealed yesterday.

They grew worried after hearing the 19-year-old Islam convert quoting fanatical hook-handed cleric Abu Hamza.

Farooq Siddique, of the Bristol Cultural Muslim Society, said: “He ruffled a few feathers.

“The Muslim community in Bristol can be proud it has sent a clear message that extremism will not be tolerated. We are all on the same side.”

Big Issue-seller Ibrahim, whose consultant dad has an £800,000 home, recently began treatment for a crack-cocaine habit.

He is being quizzed after three controlled explosions at a house in Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol.

Frightening the horses the BNP Election broadcast was never going to do. The regulations regarding airtime for political broadcasts are to do with number of candidates, In the local elections this May the BNP are fielding a sufficient number of candidates to qualify them for a PPB on nationwide TV.

I was looking forward to it purely to see how they would put their message across. I have to say that there was nothing racist about it but it was cleverly worded so we knew “what they were saying” and “who they were saying it to”. I particularly liked the last graphic, a picture of a house and the caption and voiceover, - “making Britain our home again” Everyone who needs to understand that will get the message. Judge for yourself:

I love Ireland and the Irish and now there is even more reason to do so. The EU Lisbon Treaty that subjugates our country and wipes England off the face of the map. The Irish are holding a referendum on the treaty in June and if they vote no the treaty will be scuppered for all in accordance with the rules. Hooray for the Irish. Let’s hope they have the CommonSense to reject the Lisbon treaty. Details here:

Leaked memos and French threat to Celtic Tiger economy could scupper Brussels-Dublin manoeuvring over EU treaty

Bertie Ahern was fiddling self-consciously with the buttons on his jacket when the gates of Dublin’s Government Buildings swung open and the motorcade swept into the Edwardian quadrangle.

Out leapt José Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission, smiling broadly, striding confidently up the steps to clasp the hand of the Irish Taoiseach.

It was an important moment, a show of unity designed to convince Irish voters that they have nothing to fear from the controversial Lisbon Treaty when it is put to a referendum on June 12.

Yet even as the two men emerged from their private talks to insist that Europe loved Ireland and Ireland loved what Europe had done for it, a murky deal to keep voters sweet was threatening to scupper their hopes.

Two leaked memos suggest that the Irish government and Brussels are going to great lengths to suppress bad news that might encourage a No vote - a result that would delight Eurosceptics everywhere, since if Ireland does not ratify the treaty it cannot come into force anywhere in Europe.

An internal email from a British diplomat in Dublin let slip that the commission’s vice-president, Margot Wallström, had promised the Irish government to “tone down or delay messages that might be unhelpful”.

The diplomat, Elizabeth Green, also said Ireland had decided to get the vote out of the way before France took over the EU leadership in July, to avoid “the risk of unhelpful developments during the French presidency” - noting that President Nicolas Sarkozy was “completely unpredictable”.

That’s right, very, very rare just like hens teeth. A moderate Muslim who makes complete sense and just doesn’t spout taqiyya like platitudes. From the Sun:

FOR 14 years Maajid Nawaz was a member of radical Islamist political group Hizb ut-Tahrir. But the law graduate, born in Southend, Essex, reviewed his stand while in jail in Egypt and now believes it is time British Muslims became more moderate. Here he explains why.
IT’S high time that we British Muslims stood up to put an end to the double standards of a vocal minority from within our ranks.

For far too long a culture of blaming others and protecting “our own” has been tolerated.

A new standard needs to emerge. Protecting “our own” means all the people of our country, not merely one religious faction.

Freedom of speech is a non-negotiable right. Just as some Muslims invoke this right when they attack freedom and democracy, others may invoke this right when drawing cartoons criticising our faith.

If Muslim sensitivities are a reason not to draw the cartoons, then others’ sensitivities are also a reason not to attack freedom and democracy.

We cannot have it both ways. Yes, people must be considerate of religious feelings but that discussion comes after accepting freedom of speech as a right.

If Muslims wish to protest against insulting Islam, let them begin with protesting Saudi Arabia’s destruction of national heritage sites linked to the Prophet Muhammad.

Freedom of religion is also a non-negotiable right. Just as British Muslims wish to invite others to Islam, they must accept the right of British Muslims to leave Islam. If our faith is so attractive, then what do we have to fear?

The right to life must also be non-negotiable. Just as British Muslims condemn the deaths of Muslim civilians in Iraq or Palestine, they must also condemn suicide bombings that kill nonMuslim civilians.

The silent barbaric logic behind killing “a child for a child” must cease. Murder is murder.

Freedom of the individual is non-negotiable. If Muslims object to the French ban on the hijab, we must also object to the “Islamist” plan to impose the hijab and ban women uncovering their hair.

Imposing religion or antireligion are two sides of the same coin. Extremism is intolerable. To remain silent in the face of intolerance is wrong.

If British Muslims expect wider society to speak out against racism and Islam-bashing, then British Muslims must also speak out against far-right ideologies that are interbreeding within a vocal and active minority among us.

If right-wing European films that show Islam to be a violent religion are irresponsible, then so are Islamist propaganda films that glorify suicide bombers in Palestine.

If Muslims object to right-wing conspiracy theories that we are here trying to “take over” these lands, then we must not tolerate “Islamist” conspiracy theories that believe that Jews have already taken over these lands.

Many British Muslims may read this and feel tired of constantly being bashed in the media. They may object and say that these views exist only in a minority of Muslims. My view is that we have done far too little, far too late, and must now play catch up.

The right-wing minority of non-Muslims are shunned by wider society until they change. They are not given legitimacy in major community centres, and if they were there would be outrage.

In British Muslims’ communities, our own right-wing minority happens to be a strong, organised and vocal minority. In some cases it even directs Muslim public debate.

I say this after having spent 14 years being a member of one of these organisations.

At worst, many Muslims tolerated my views. At best, I witnessed them spread like wildfire through the young and angry members of my faith.

Many of our “community organisations” are still headed up by ideologues with links to foreign Islamist organisations.

These ideologues run some of our major mosques. Double standards are an un-Islamic trait. The justice that our faith commands us to show to all, not just to Muslims, demands that we make more effort.

Finally, a fair reader would ask why I have not spoken out against the double standards that exist amongst the wider non-Muslim society.

My answer: I have been doing that all my life and I will continue to do so.

But my voice will be more credible and will reach a far wider audience if it is a fair and upright voice, as a Muslim is meant to be.

 The Daily Express is nervously sticking it’s head out of the shell again and reporting on issues that mention the “Muslim” word. Here it is stating the bleeding obvious:

THE FINDING by the Chief Inspector of Prisons Ann Owers that Muslim convicts in Belmarsh Maximum Security Prison are at risk of ­converting to fanaticism, if they are not fanatics already, will send shivers down many people’s spines.

Has Belmarsh become a university of ­terrorism? Young men love risk, danger and annoying their elders (I was not averse to these things in my youth).

Prisoners are mostly young men: they have time on their hands and are generally embittered, not recognising their own respon­sibility for their situation. They want an answer to their misery.

For some, religious or political fanaticism is the answer they seek. It gives meaning, purpose and the spice of danger to their lives. It will seri­ously annoy and frighten the authorities, whom they hate. It allows them to despise others, to be cruel, aggressive and even violent while persuading themselves that they are on the side of ultimate good.

It is foolish indeed to allow them to use prison for recruitment and terror attack planning. If they can’t be kept seperately from other prisoners why not? Doh! Human rights. Fxxk their human rights, these people are hardly human and certainly shouldn’t be granted the priviledge of human rights. Build a prison especially for them, the Islamists or Jihadis, on a remote unpopulated Scottish island or put them in one of the many underground cold war bunkers where they will not see the light of day.

 The bullshit and arrogance that issues from NuLabour takes my breath away. On one day we hear that a very small proportion of the population - immigrants - are responsible for more than their share of murders and on the next day NuLabour denies it, and tries to muddy the water in the process. This from Leo McInstry of the Daily Express:

A NEW bulletin has just been issued which is worthy of George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth.

Apparently there is no link between crime and mass immigration.

According to Peter Fahy, chief constable of Cheshire and one of the co-authors of a report from the Association of Chief Police Officers, the idea of a migrant crime wave is nothing more than “a myth” invented by a sinister media to create “resentment and misunderstanding”.

This rose-tinted view holds that most newcomers are professionals with qualifications who come here to boost our economy.

Only a politically correct ideologue determined to brainwash the public could come out with drivel like this. Whereas the rank and file and some very senior coppers make it plain in the report that immigration has put huge pressures on policing, Peter Fahy’s imput is truly Orwellian in its denial of reality, trying to tell people not to believe what they can see with their own eyes.

 Any viewer of the BBC’s Crimewatch and any reader of a local newspaper will be only too aware of the grim weekly catalogue of murders, rapes, shootings, thefts and stabbings perpetrated by thugs from immigrant communities.

As one member of the public put it yesterday in response to the ACPO study: “In my area the number of immigrants has rocketed since Labour came to power and the number of muggings and street crimes have significantly increased. The streets were once very peaceful but in the last 10 years we have had four murders, two committed by Afghans and two by Eastern European gangs.”

This is the experience of so many British people today who have seen their once well-ordered civilisation crack under the brutal pressure of mass migration. It is an insult to our intelligence to suggest otherwise.

Yet that is the game Labour ministers have been playing for far too long, with their endless injunctions that we should all “celebrate” the joys of multicultural diversity and applaud the benefits of immigration even while we have to watch the collapse of our once great nation.

Labour’s central aim is to mislead the public about what is really happening in our country. It is all too reminiscent of something from the former Soviet Union, where hard-pressed citizens were urged by the politburo to rejoice in bogus figures on national prosperity while all around was abject poverty.

Like the cheerleaders of Russian communism some of our police chiefs now seem to regard their primary duty as the promotion of Labour’s destructive ideology on immigration.
Read the rest of this entry »

The Daily Express, which has gone quiet on Muslim issues since they were threatened by a demonstration outside their offices is majoring on immigration now. They printed the story about babies for sale but the TV media pundits dismissed the story as the usual Express hyperbole.

Well, it wasn’t hyperbole. The Sun also carried the story and it has become obvious that the police back up the story that it is a fraud carried out on a large scale. I believe it, hook, line and sinker because if there is a fraud going immigrants will be into it:

THOUSANDS of babies are being BOUGHT abroad by fraudsters who use them to get free council homes in Britain, police believe.

The scandal emerged as a Nigerian woman was told she will be jailed after she paid £150 for a tot to bring here.

Peace Sandberg, 40, flew home to get the three-month-old boy from a hospital after being evicted from a rented pad in Acton, West London. The divorcee returned to Heathrow, told immigration he was hers – then went straight to a homeless unit to dupe Ealing Council.

Staff called police because they had seen her in November and she was NOT pregnant. She eventually admitted she wasn’t the mum.

Cops found a forged birth certificate. The tot was taken into care.

Sandberg was convicted of bringing a non-EU citizen into the UK, at Isleworth Crown Court on Friday. Judge Sam Kathkuda told her: “These offences always attract a custodial sentence.”

A police source said later: “The extent of child trafficking for benefit fraud and domestic servitude is becoming clearer. We believe there are thousands of cases. The more we look into it, the more we find.”

Another report states that FOREIGNERS are responsible for one out of five murders, shocking figures show:

The findings highlight the failure to deport criminals who have served sentences for lesser crimes and who then go on to kill.

Of 461 people convicted of, or charged with, murder in the 12 months before April last year, 96 were foreign. They came from 28 different countries.

Backbench Tory MP David Davies said last night: “These extraordinary figures demonstrate the failure of the Government’s immigration policy, which has seen all sorts of undesirable characters being able to get into this country and use the Human Rights Act to escape deportation.”

The figures also demonstrate the extent  to which foreign gangs are operating here.

Scotland Yard said half the crime gangs in London were from ethnic minorities.

The most common nationalities for foreign killers were Pakistani, Indian and Jamaican. The increasing number of foreign killers is also increasing the financial burden on the taxpayer. 

Nothing like enhancing our multicultural society is it? Exactly, nothing like. Immigration benefitting the country? As most of the violence is perpetrated on the white indigenous population to the denial of the authorities what are we to do?

The Stephen Lawrence case has established a “fashionable” movement but the horrible racist death of Kriss Donald by five Pakistani Muslims was largely ignored by the government and the media. More on this at Sarah: Maid of Albion.

The astute amongst you may have noticed a leaning in my writings towards Englishness. The previous posting was concerned with the excessive Scottish influence on the extermination of England. I don’t want to be British because it means nothing and has been devalued. I would campaign for the right to describe my ethnicity correctly as can others. I do not want to have to tick a box labelled “White British” as my only choice because that could also be ticked by some naturalised Albanian scum criminal.

In the first of my investigation into the alternatives to mainstream politics I have been investigating The English Democrats. Their manifesto makes sense and although they plan to curb immigration there is no way they can sensibly be accused of racism. The criteria is simply to uphold the values of English culture, language and history.

One of the most important reasons for watching this fledgling party closely is that Matt O’Conner is involved. It is he who features in the vid below as he stands for the London Mayoral election.

O’ Conner has a track record as leader of the “Father’s For Justice” movement which achieved success in getting the attention of the media, including the “bombing” of Tony Blair in parliament with purple flour. So here we have someone who knows the ropes of the MSM and is capable of implementing a strategy that will lead to heightened public awareness. This is the most important quality of leadership at this stage of things.

“We do not claim Englishness to be purely ethnic or purely cultural, but it is a complex mix of the two. We firmly believe Englishness is a state of mind, and if people are born in England and have an English heritage they are welcome to share our national identity. Newcomers to this country are also welcome, providing they abide by English laws and conventions and seek to identify and give their loyalty to England.”

Who the British people are is changing on a scale never experienced before. The driving force for this change is immigration. This transformation, which is bringing about revolutionary changes in the composition of the population, has never been debated, let alone approved by the voters. While the government claims that such an event is a product of globalisation, it is also a result of policies they have consciously set in train since 1997. Frank Field MP

The Labour government has transformed England over the last 11 years by allowing vast numbers of immigrants to settle here against the wishes of the majority of the indigenous population. The politicians involved are mainly Scottish or of Scottish origin. Tony Blair was born in Scotland and was educated there, whilst Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling and others are Scottish.

They can do this safely in the knowledge that their home country still has a strong national identity and will no doubt be independent of the Union in half a dozen years or so.

The Scots have always hated the English so this then is their ultimate revenge. With the help of the EU, England will no longer exist but will be split into nine regions, and the English will become a minority in their own country. This from Frank Field, Labour MP: 

A revolution on a par with Stalin

BRITAIN is being transformed by the mass movement of people in and out of the country at a rate never before experienced in our history.

In 2004 almost one million people came to live in Britain while 340,000 left to start a new life beyond our shores. If this trend continues, one-tenth of the country’s population will have been changed within the life of a five-year parliament.

The revolution is on a par with Stalin’s forced migration of Ukraine.

He set out to transform Ukraine by forcing out the existing population and replacing it with citizens loyal to the Soviet Republic.

The Ukrainians did not vote for Stalin’s brutal policy. Nor have voters here agreed to the transformation of England.

The Government wants the population to rise through immigration by six million over 30 years, and for this six million to settle largely in England.

At the current rate, that objective will be met in a third of the time.

Why is the Government blindly leading the country to a disaster that HEARTBREAK: Ania as a baby with mother Sylwia, above, and at the orphanage, left. She is too withdrawn to mix with other children there, above right will result if this open-door policy continues? The most charitable view is that it has no idea of the erupting scale of the movement of people.

No country can maintain freedom and order under the pressure parts of Britain are now experiencing.

The Government has estimated an influx of 230,000 people from new EU accession countries from May 2004 to June 2005. But these figures exclude the self-employed 187,500 estimated by a Newsnight survey, giving a 417,500 total. Add in arrivals from the rest of the world and we get 900,000 moving here in one year.

New arrivals naturally congregate in certain areas, bringing increased competition for houses and jobs.

Wages are being pushed down. The number of immigrants in 2004 alone amounts to five times the number of social houses built by Labour over a nine-year period.

It is not on race, but on the sheer scale of numbers, that it is proper to demand a halt. The Government should impose a quota system on entrants to the country. It should impose a ban on the movement from accession countries until all our European partners agree to open up their labour markets. We should protect our borders.

Hat Tip: Home of the Green Arrow

It’s well known that some Muslims regard non-believers as less than human indeed as no more than domestic animals on a par with a cow or goat. That this is encouraged by the Quran there is no doubt - quotations to come, courtesy of truthseaker. That they can keep humans for the harvesting of organs has recently emerged from the Balkans. This is evil and depraved and was perpetrated by ethnic Albanians on Serbs. The ethnic Albanians have been rewarded by having Kosovo handed to them on a plate. This from a new book by Carla Del Ponte:

Serb prisoners had their internal organs removed and sold by ethnic Albanians during the Kosovo war, according to allegations in a new book by the world’s best known war crimes prosecutor.

Carla Del Ponte, who stepped down in January as chief prosecutor at the Hague tribunal for crimes committed in the Balkan wars of the 1990s, said investigators found a house suspected of being a laboratory for the illegal trade.

Miss Del Ponte reports that the allegations were made by several sources, one of whom “personally made an organ delivery” to an Albanian airport for transport abroad, and “confirmed information directly gathered by the tribunal”.

According to the sources, senior figures in the Kosovo Liberation Army were aware of the scheme, in which hundreds of young Serbs were allegedly taken by truck from Kosovo to northern Albania where their organs were removed. Miss Del Ponte provides grim details of the alleged organ harvesting, and of how some prisoners were sewn up after having kidneys removed.

“The victims, deprived of a kidney, were then locked up again, inside the barracks, until the moment they were killed for other vital organs. In this way, the other prisoners were aware of the fate that awaited them, and according to the source, pleaded, terrified, to be killed immediately,” Miss Del Ponte writes.

The claims in The Hunt: Me and War Criminals have renewed tensions between Serbia and its former province of Kosovo, which declared independence two months ago. In it, the Swiss ex-prosecutor reveals how her efforts to bring alleged war criminals to justice were stymied by lack of co-operation from all sides - Serb, Albanian and even Nato. But it is her report of the organ traffic that has caused most shock, even in a region long hardened to horror.

The mind boggles that a so called human being could treat another human being in this way. Words fail me. Of course there are denials but there would be wouldn’t there?

The English judges need a dose of commonsense. Allowing al-Qaeda’s right hand man to stay in this country plus other Islamic terrorists plus preachers of hate is something that people cannot understand.

Compare this with the fifteen year old schoolgirl who was to be deported back to the US, or the woman suffering from cancer deported back to Ghana, and who subsequently died, and many others. It’s about time something was done about it. Italy manages to deport foreign criminals or undesirables and so should we.

Bollox to their human rights. Islamists who plot to kill innocent people should not have human rights that prevent us from removing them from our country. Some would say they don’t deserve any human rights whatsoever.

“I don’t care if you are muslim or not, you are not one of us, I will not give you my land, women and History without a fight!”

Fjordman, from Norway is one of Europe’s most forward thinking bloggers and has written many thought provoking articles. His latest essay proposes that a “European indigenous peoples movement” should be created. This is so important that I believe it should go viral on the web. Here is an extract:

 There is no love lost between me and the Chinese Communist Party, an organization responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of its citizens, but even Chinese authorities do not actively seek to displace their own people with violent Muslims. European authorities do.

In decadent societies of the past, the authorities didn’t open the gates to hostile nations and ban opposition to this as intolerance and barbarophobia. What we are dealing with in the modern West is not merely decadence; it’s one of the greatest betrayals in history. Our so-called leaders pass laws banning the opposition to our dispossession as “racism and hate speech.” To native Europeans, when listening to our media and our leaders, it’s as if we don’t even exist, as if it were normal for them to put the interests of other nations over their own. Despite having “democratic” governments, many Western countries have authorities that are more hostile to their own people than dictators in some developing countries. Why?

[…]

Numbers discussed in 2008 showed clearly that mass immigration has had no positive effects on the economy in Britain, and I have seen similar calculations from France, Denmark and Norway, among others. On the contrary, it is a drain on the finances of the native population, and that’s even if we don’t count the wave of terrorism, insecurity and street violence which is sweeping Western Europe, from Sweden via Germany to the Netherlands. On top of this, the costs of destruction of national cohesion and weakened cultural legacies are incalculable, yet mass immigration continues as if nothing has happened.

Fjordman makes the case for the right of aboriginal Europeans to maintain and protect their homelands:

Genetically speaking, native Europeans have thus lived longer on the same continent than have Native Americans. Many Southeast Asians are descendants of southern Chinese settlers who displaced or eradicated the original, dark-skinned inhabitants of the region in early historical times, just as many of the nations of sub-Saharan Africa are Bantu invaders who displaced or eradicated the indigenous Khoi-San peoples throughout much of Africa. Modern-day Japanese have lived in Japan for a shorter period of time than Europeans have lived in Europe. Yet a Scottish councillor, Sandy Aitchison, was chastised for using the term “indigenous” about native Brits. Why is it considered ridiculous or evil if Europeans assert our rights? Is it because we are white? Everybody’s supposed to keep their culture, except people of European origins? Is that it? Why is colonialism bad, except when my country, which has no colonial history, gets colonized by Third World peoples?

[…]

I started out initially writing almost exclusively about Islam, and I still write predominantly about Islam. However, I have gradually realized that we are dealing with an entire regime of censorship that needs to be removed before we can deal with Islam. I will in any situation highlight and support the struggle of Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Baha’is, Jews, African Christians, Chinese Taoists etc. against Islamic Jihad, which is a global fight. I always have and I always will. The one thing I will not do is surrender my land, which is not mine to give. I do not see anybody else quietly accept being turned into a minority in the country where their ancestors have lived since the end of the last Ice Age, and I cannot see why I should have to do so, either. I don’t care if white Westerners are “scared of being called a racist.” I will not leave a ruined land behind to my descendants because I was afraid of being called bad names. If you think it is “racist” for Europeans to preserve their heritage and protect their children from abuse, then I’m not the bigot here. You are.

I hereby propose that native Europeans should create a European Indigenous People’s Movement, on behalf of the traditional majority populations of Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark etc., inspired by the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The European Indigenous People’s Movement should support the right of Europe’s indigenous peoples to preserve their self-determination, traditions, sovereignty and culture as majority peoples in their own lands.

The list of goals and objectives should include:

He then goes on to propose the creation of a European Indigenous People’s Movement, and lists a set of six goals and objectives for the movement.
Read it all here

Hat Tip to Gates of Vienna

Here’s the official Fitna movie that has caused a huge amount of fuss. Was it worth it? You decide. I have hosted it on Viddler which means it wont be overloaded and you can watch it better than on the official site. You can also download it in minutes, which might be a good idea. ONLY VIDDLER MEMBERS CAN DOWNLOAD, SO JOIN, IT’S EASY

Fitna - The Movie

UPDATE: VIDDLER HAVE REMOVED IT. NO EXPLANATION GIVEN. 30,000 VIEWS SO FAR. NUMBER 3 IN LIST OF MOST POPULAR.

Uploaded again to a different account. Download while you can.

Fitna - The Movie

 Looks like this is the way to go. Could it be an undercover organisation working within the limitations of British law to train a private vigilante army for the civil war to come? After all, we cannot count on our own security forces to protect us when the shit hits the fan and all those battle hardened British Muslim veterans from Afghanistan take to the streets with their AK47’s. From the Daily Mail :

 Muslim leaders condemned a new war game where teams of soldiers shoot at enemies - dressed as Arabs.

Men in camouflaged military gear battle opponents wearing shemaghs - the traditional headdress of Arab men - at Zulu 1 Tactical Airsoft Simulations.

Participants use replica machine guns, pistols and sniper rifles which fire 6mm BB rounds at a 20-acre former RAF hospital in Nocton, Lincs.

Better than painball guns, nearer the real thing.

Images from the company’s website show soldiers pointing rifles at hooded “Arab” men spreadeagled on the floor following “close quarter battles.”

Founders Peter Jenkins, 41, and Darren Howells, 42, denied the use of Arab headdress was racist, claiming it was the “easiest way to tell who the enemy are.”

But the Muslim Association of Britain slammed the scheme as “short-sighted and foolish.”

Executive member Mokhtar Badri said: “Any sort of game that associates guns and violence with a particular culture is clearly wrong.

That’s a bit rich considering hundreds if not thousands of British Muslims travel to Pakistan for training to fight our boys in Afghanistan.

“They could use any other type of colour or dress to tell between teams which would not cause offence.

“Using Arab dress, especially in the current climate, is short-sighted and foolish.

“And regardless of the offence causes, young people should not be given the opportunity to play in an environment where guns are being glamourised.”

Launching with a grand opening on May 25, organisers are planning a series of battles between 120 men over woodland, trenches and disused buildings.

They will be split into teams with one half wearing the shemaghs for identification.

Members as young as 16 pay a £30 joining fee and receive an hour of health and safety training before battle.

Over 40 have already signed up for the battle opening.

Hopefully it will grow and thousands will sign up. 

Jenkins said the use of the shemaghs was to add authenticity to the experience and they were frequently used by British soldiers.

He added that Airsoft is safer than paintballing as pellets only travel 30 to 40 metres.

He said: “We simply use the shemaghs to differentiate between teams. Just because some terrorists decide to wear them doesn’t make it racist.

“You can buy them on any high street and the British army give them to their own troops.

“They are very visible and can be easily spotted in battle. This is a very popular sport and people should remember it is just a game at the end of the day.

“BB guns are essentially toys.”

BB hand grenades, smoke grenades, night-vision scopes and silencers are also used during the battle.

Sounds as if it has a more serious purpose than a game. 

The guns, which can cost up to £1,000, include the ArmaLite M-16 replica which fires 200 rounds a minute at 350ft per second.

One Nocton resident, who asked not to be named, said: “After the 7/7 bombings in London they assessed Lincolnshire as unlikely to be a hard target but useable for storage of terrorists and for training purposes.

“If we start allowing stuff like this we don’t know what type of people it will attract.”

As long as they are serious minded British patriots and not undercover Muslims then this could be a worthwhile cause. Not that we will ever know. Any hint of a hidden agenda and they’ll be hit with a ton of bricks from the authorities.